🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.